[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Re: wikipedia page on livelooping
Mark F says
I for one would NOT be up for the job.
me neither, don't think I'm indepedant enough.
However the more general "Loop" aricle that Tyler cited
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music) is quite ok. Despite SOME
additions, and a few more examples, it could be that the Live Looping page
should just be deleted and redirected to tis one.
Mark
Well, if we have a *reference* to support the idea that live-looping
is some kind of art form in it's own right then surely
it can have it's own page.
But what exactly qualifies as a reference?
I learned a bit from that article.
Standard way to spam wikipedia for self promotion is to write
bits of biog then do a bogus reference which is actually one of your
youtube vids.
Then it it *looks* like you're playing fair with wikipedia.
andy
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Z <zzz@zzz.ch <mailto:zzz@zzz.ch>> wrote:
Hello all!
Some guy or admin decided to decimate the wikipedia page on
livelooping. I tried to undo his changes but with no success, says there
needs to be more 'references'... It might be a good time for those of us
who'd be eager to share their stories to rebuild it? It totally is lame
right now..
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_looping
Cheers
:)
z
--
/_Mark Francombe_/
www.markfrancombe.com <http://www.markfrancombe.com/>
www.ordoabkhao.com <http://www.ordoabkhao.com/>
http://vimeo.com/user825094
http://www.looop.no <http://www.looop.no/>
twitter @markfrancombe