] [Thread Prev
Re: looping tits on LD site??
*laughing* You go Kim!!! -would love to see some hot male loopers!
lollollol! I'm not at all opposed to nudity!, -just bad taste! lol! -I
do afterall, have some pics of myself on my own webpage, which are of
course, extremely tasteful! lol!
At 01:45 PM 7/17/02 -0700, you wrote:
>The LD site is back alive. It was out for the last few hours due to some
>mysterious problem that crashed Apache. We're checking into that to make
>sure it doesn't happen again.
>Meanwhile, sorry about that bulls-eye ad if it bothers you. (although
>people click on that than most other ads, so I guess it doesn't bother
>of you....) It is kind of embarrassing to have stupid things like that
>the site. That particular ad is basically one of several default ads from
>an ad service that appears when I don't have someone paying for that
>For some reason Electrix wasn't interested in renewing their ad campaign
>and I haven't had time to find someone else, so we got half-naked ladies.
>That ad alone doesn't pay well enough to be worth it, so I'll pull it out
>of rotation. Or, if there are any attractive male loopers out there,
>feel free to send me half naked photos of yourselves and I'll include
>in the rotation to balance things out. Maybe we can have a looper dating
>service, or a hot talk line where people can call to have the looper of
>their dreams talk to them about midi clocks and cable routing. For sure
>Mark Sottilaro's hairy legs would rake in the bucks.
>At 06:28 AM 7/17/2002, Stephen P. Goodman wrote:
>>I'm not even getting THAT - loopers-delight.com times out from here,
>>attempts to attach to 22.214.171.124, and then just sits there, blank. A
>>trace is indicative of delays but not just on the host's part...?
>Kim Flint | Looper's Delight
>firstname.lastname@example.org | http://www.loopers-delight.com
"The only things I really think are important, are love, and eachother.
-Then, anything is possible..."
Please visit The Guitar Cafe.