Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Eliminating a mid section of a loop -was- Re: multiple jam-things



Yes, and its so easy just tapping the record after
multiply...ha,ha i love it!
With the edp i have to stop thinking in terms of
software:-)
--- Goddess <thefates@earthlink.net> wrote:
>   <smile>   -or, even more accurately, as Kim has
> mentioned, regular
> multiply ended with record as well.   *laughing* 
> fortunately I read
> further this time, before answering that next
> e-mail!   lol!   
> 
> Smiles,
> 
> Cara
> 
> At 11:50 PM 5/10/03 -0600, you wrote:
> >  Louie, you can eliminate a middle section from a
> loop with the EDP, by
> >using multiply.  -or more accurately, sus unrounded
> multiply.  
> >  If your loop consisted of an A B and C section
> like you mention, you can
> >wait until B passes, and then engage sus unrounded
> multiply as C starts,
> >and then disengage it after the A section goes by. 
>  Now, you've
> >effectively eliminated the B section.  Does this
> make sense?  
> >  As someone else mentioned, windowing can do this
> too, but this way may be
> >quicker and more precise I think.   <smile>   -HOpe
> this helps.  
> >
> >Smiles,
> >
> >Cara
> >
> >At 12:22 PM 5/8/03 -0700, you wrote:
> >>Mark you are absolutely right man!
> >>I have both the EDP and repeater and sometimes i
> just
> >>get too exhausted specially syncing them
> together.I
> >>spend too much time on the technical side of
> things
> >>and lately i am very unfocused on the music.I ve
> been
> >>thinking of taking one of them out of my rack for
> a
> >>couple of months just to build a better
> relationship
> >>with one of them.In terms of creativity they are
> both
> >>animals!
> >>Another thing ive noticed is that i do most of my
> >>looping uncounsciously within the first 10 seconds
> at
> >>the most.I suppose certain limitations are healthy
> at
> >>times as well...
> >>My one wish from both loopers for example would be
> >>that i could cut a middle part (from A,B,C cut B
> and
> >>paste A and C together) sort of like Acid.Or is
> there
> >>a way of accompishing this...
> >>You loop gurus outhere?
> >>Cheers
> >>Louie
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--- mark <sine@zerocrossing.net> wrote:
> >>> I can't imagine using the word "sync" and "Line6
> >>> Echo Pro" in the same 
> >>> sentence... unless you're talking about it's
> delays,
> >>> and even then I'd 
> >>> say it's not really syncing.  However, this can
> be
> >>> very cool too.  A 
> >>> few weeks ago Will Wright and I jammed, he on
> the
> >>> Echo Pro and I using 
> >>> a Repeater and we more or less just set the Echo
> >>> Pro's loop size my 
> >>> ear.  Since what will was doing was leaning
> toward
> >>> the abstract it was 
> >>> interesting to have the sync of his loop
> constantly
> >>> drifting from my 
> >>> loops which firmly follow the drummachine.  That
> >>> constantly changing 
> >>> relationship is nice.
> >>> 
> >>> There are days I still miss my JamMan's "simple"
> >>> operation (I had an 
> >>> early Bob Sallon chip mod that gave me some new
> >>> functions, but I don't 
> >>> think I got things like the panning and multiple
> >>> concurrent loops)  It 
> >>> makes me want one again!  What I love best about
> the
> >>> JamMan that *no* 
> >>> other looper does?  One step loop creation when
> >>> synced to a MIDI clock. 
> >>>   I choose the amount of beats it looks for and
> the
> >>> start point and then 
> >>> I can just PLAY.  Yeah, I know you can do
> something
> >>> a little similar 
> >>> with the EDP, but I've tried that and it's *not*
> the
> >>> same.  My request 
> >>> for Loop5 would be to have a mode where you can
> set
> >>> up your quantize 
> >>> and after hitting record automatically go into
> >>> overdub after a 
> >>> specified number of beats.
> >>> 
> >>> For a short time I did run an EDP and a Repeater
> at
> >>> the same time, and 
> >>> I found it to be too much.  Each unit does
> PLENTY in
> >>> my opinion.  I 
> >>> rarely ended up using them both together, but I
> >>> would imagine like 
> >>> anything it would need lot's of practice.  It
> always
> >>> felt like I was 
> >>> that guy who spins plates on the Ed Sullivan
> show
> >>> when I was using 
> >>> multiple loopers.  Too hard to focus on the
> music,
> >>> especially in a live 
> >>> context where things are more chaotic.
> >>> 
> >>> Mark Sottilaro
> >>> 
> >>> On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 08:12  AM,
> >>> goddard.duncan@mtvne.com wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> > stuart's post about syncing three line6
> echopros
> >>> reminded me that I 
> >>> > wanted to ask the list if anybody had tried
> doing
> >>> much the same thing 
> >>> > with two or more jammans. my band has two, and
> two
> >>> repeaters aswell.
> >>> 
> >>
> >>
> >>=====
> >>www.labalou.com
> >>
> >>__________________________________
> >>Do you Yahoo!?
> >>The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> >>http://search.yahoo.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >---
> >
> >  "The only things I really think are important,
> are love, and eachother.
> >-Then, anything is possible..."  
> >
> >http://home.earthlink.net/~thefates
> >
> >Please visit BadFiction and The Guitar Cafe.  
> >
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/badfiction 
> >
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the-guitar-cafe 
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> 
>   "The only things I really think are important, are
> love, and eachother.
> -Then, anything is possible..."  
> 
> http://home.earthlink.net/~thefates
> 
> Please visit BadFiction and The Guitar Cafe.  
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/badfiction 
> 
=== message truncated ===


=====
www.labalou.com

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com