] [Thread Prev
OT: tuning issues (was Re: Even More Slash....)
Eric Williamson wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2004, at 6:28 PM, David Beardsley wrote:
>> Eric Williamson wrote:
>>> but yes, one of my favourite realities of music in the year 2004 is
>>> that there is truly nothing new, as our musical opportunities are
>>> limited by the overtone series of western instruments.
>> Care to elaborate on that statement? Why limited?
> ah i forgot about the microtonal aspect, reminded by your sig.
> i really should have clarified that with the word "diatonic" in
> between "our" and "musical".
> i feel that diatonic music is limited by the integer-multiple overtone
> series. there are only so many ways to string 7 (or 12, if you're into
> tone rows and that sort of thing) notes together, and every time i try
> to write a melody, i'm reminded of that.
> i personally am not interested in using non-diatonic-based tunings in
> my music, because i don't feel that an appropriate enough combination
> of interface, instrument, and price point exists yet to make me
> interested in it. i'm not a guitarist, i'm a keyboardist. when i think
> about Wendy's Alpha scale it makes my head spin.
If I understand your comments,
I get the impression that you think a microtonal scale has to have more
than 12 notes. This is not the case.
> an instrument i would really like to see that would get me into
> microtuning would be a digital Hammond organ clone where the digital
> tonewheels could be tuned to different scales. _That_ would get me
> excited. especially if it had a "stretch" knob so i could finally play
> an Hammond in proper tune with a piano!
> Eric Williamson
That would take all the grease out of the organ!
* David Beardsley
* microtonal guitar