] [Thread Prev
Re: "Instrument" vs "Effect"
Sing it brother! Where's Andre LaFosse when I need
him!? I never argued with someone who I agreed with
more. Shame he left the list.
Let me end this. Looping isn't "an instrument" but
it's just as much a part of an instrument and an amp
is to a guitarist or a LFO is to a keyboard player.
Remember those old BASF commercials? We don't make
the ______, we make it better." Asking if looping is
an instrument is like asking if a guitar pick is an
instrument. Of course it isn't, but it's part of a
system that makes the instrument behave in a specific
way facilitating a "style" of playing at most. That
cyclical style of music is what we call "looping" but
it's far from a type of music.
So can we please move on from this? It's way past
silly at this point.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "a k butler" <email@example.com>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 11:43 AM
> Subject: Re: "Instrument" vs "Effect"
> >> It confirms my observation and experiences of
> years of debating that
> >> most disagreements and differences of opinion are
> semantic and not
> >> related to any substantial facts.
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around