[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Electrix Repeater



Yeah, I too regret selling mine! ;-(

Even though I liked the EDP better, those two boxes,  EDP + Repeater,
was a very powerful duo in tandem. Running the EDP as the temp sync
master and slaving the Repeater. You could keep abusing it to get cool
sounds, in a way that if you do it in software it kills the OS or the
application.

Greetings from Sweden

Per Boysen
www.perboysen.com
www.boysen.se


On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Simeon Harris
<simeonharris40@googlemail.com> wrote:
> yes, version 2 is amazing. here is a link to the manual for it…check it 
> out!
> -
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/yaogg3pgpde2lt5/Repeater%20Software%20V2.01%20Manual.pdf?dl=0
>
> i really regret selling mine :O(
>
>
> On 21 Mar 2017, at 05:32, mark francombe <markfrancombe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 2.0 rocks! Can't remember 1
>
> Sent from my (advertisement removed)
>
> On 21 Mar 2017, at 04:33, Jeff Larson <jeff.larson@sailpoint.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I'm emerging from hibernation for a bit and I have a 
> question.
>
>
> I bought a Repeater awhile ago out of curiosity and am thinking about
> sending it off to Condor for the usual hardware and software upgrades.  
> I'm
> toying with software emulation, but I know enough about pitch shifting
> algorithms to admit I probably won't come close to duplicating that.  
> Still,
> I'd like to understand how the basic control flow of the Repeater works.
> Everyone wants the hardware noise mods.  But is the 2.x software upgrade
> something everyone would want or are there folks that prefer the original
> 1.x version?  I'd rather not mess with both versions, but as my wife 
> reminds
> me, my life's calling seems to be providing complicated free software to
> dozens of people :-)
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>
>
>