Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
If nothing else, I think this argument shows that even _we_, by and large, don't know what kind of music we play - and then get upset when other people don't know either!! I think - being honest - that this group has something of a tendency towards taking itself a bit too seriously. That's not to say that making music isn't a deep and serious event. Perhaps what I'm saying is that sometimes there's an intellectual snobbery around here. Most people seem deeply offended by an association with New Age. However, I think that whilst there's an awful lot of crap under that banner it often extends to people like Mike Oldfield and Vangelis (musicians I have the utmost respect for). Olfield has also been called "Art Rock", "Progressive Rock" and "Contemporary Classical". It probably isn't any of these, but who cares? He doesn't. Most people don't. We're never as unique as we think we are, and pushing the boundaries is only likely to be noticed by someone who knows what those boundaries are, dreamed of breaking them and hasn't had a bad day at the office. If people say I'm playing New Age, and it keeps 'em happy, fine. It doesn't change the music in any way. I think the only time this becomes a problem is when we're trying to get gigs or put CDs in bins (the latter being a problem for very few). As regards gigs, I'd say just be pragmatic and say whatever's most likely to get the gig. Ditto the record bins, just put the CD where it'll sell the most. In fact, New Age music buyers are oftem more likely to make impulse purchaces than people shopping from the Rock/Pop section, hence more sales. I think maybe this ties in with an old thread about whether we be artists or entertainers. Michael Dr Michael Pycraft Hughes * Bioelectronic Research Centre, Rankine Bldg, Tel: (+44) 141 330 5979 * University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, U.K. Fax: (+44) 141 330 4907 * "And the answers? Sometimes the answers www.elec.gla.ac.uk/~pycraft * just come in the mail" -Laurie Anderson