Support |
I think we may still have a clue! ;) Tom At 03:59 PM 1/23/98 -0600, you wrote: >We were working on this idea at g-wiz several years ago. It's an >interesting >concept, with some unique challenges and possibilities. Unfortunately, >most >of the people working on it got fired right about the time they were about >to produce some initial demos, so nothing came of it. Gibson never had a >clue what they lost when they did that. too bad.... > >kim > >At 04:35 PM 1/23/98 -0500, Jeff Duke wrote: >>I have been pondering how this could be accomplished myself.I have heard about >>jamming with midi over the internet but audio?hmmm,maybe bandwith is god(small >>g) >>Jeff Duke sr. >>Darcy Clark wrote: >> >>> It occurs to me that looping would be particularly suited to internet >>> jamming, as latency could be accommodated by using longish loop times, >and >>> by only adding contributions to the loop at the start of the next loop. All >>> we need now is a TCP/IP-aware Jamman upgrade !!! ;) >>> >>> >Some people of been exploring the musical possibilities of HUGE >>> >latencies through internet jams. Last month some folks in NYC jammed >>> >with some other folks in Japan where latencies where up around 10 >>> >seconds, at least! It's a feature, not a bug... >>> >________________________________________________________ >Kim Flint 408-752-9284 >Mpact System Engineering kflint@chromatic.com >Chromatic Research http://www.chromatic.com > > > >