Support |
Michael Peters wrote: > > >I think RealAudio is the best choice if streaming and a large > >installation base are the main concerns. > > that's right but just to make sure, you (or your internet provider) need >a > realaudio server for streaming. If you don't have a realaudio server, you > can't do streaming realaudio, but you can still use the encoder to >produce > real small audio files for people to download. Actually, even without a RealServer, you can do HTTP streaming. From the RealAudio and RealVideo Content Creation Guide Version 5.0: "HTTP streaming of RealAudio or RealVideo files enables content providers to stream RealAudio and RealVideo clips from a World Wide Web server. While this method is not as robust [as RealServer], it provides a reasonable method for providing short RealAudio and RealVideo content to a limited number of users. RealAudio and RealVideo works with all popular Web servers." I've found that HTTP streaming works fairly well from my site. In fact, with my brand-new 56K modem, I've even heard my 40.3KBPS files without interruption on some occasions, though not always. John Troubador Tech (http://people.delphi.com/johnpollock/)