Support |
Everybody: The URL for Audiomulch: http://www.webpage.com.au/audiomulch/noframes.htm > -----Original Message----- > From: Gareth Whittock [mailto:whiteoak@dial.pipex.com] > Sent: Saturday 12 December 1998 8:56 AM > To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com > Subject: Re: this looper's delight > > > Hello chaps, > 'Been messing with a brilliant program for the PC - Audiomulch. > It's what I've ben looking for for a loooong time. > Basically its a series of signal processing "contraptions", > ring mod, stereo delay up to 2seconds per side, phaser, > flanger, mixers spatialiser, (doppler shifter) and - wait for it > > REAL TIME GRANULATOR YES YES YES :))))))) > > So you set up the real time input icon and attatch it to say > a stereo delay, (of course) but then you set up another > stereo delay, and another........ > you can feed the signal back into itself via a virtual > mixer, perhaps also via a parametric eq or a reverb contraption > so each successive delay is more reverberated than the last. > and yes you could arrange it so that you can set up a loop > by opening the input to one of an array of delays,set up a loop > close its input thus leaving it running and then open another > leaving you with the option to fade the original. If you have > enough processing power you could have quite a few going. > I have a Pentium 1 200mhz and can set up 2 * 8 sec independant > delays (mono) with the ability to fade each in or out. I've taken > audiomulch to work, (purely in the interests of research you understand) > and it runs about 4 times as fast on that p2 333mhz. Thats 8 * 8second > mono delays all at once. I can't stop using this thing:)) > > The latency is about 160 millisecs on my system which I can certainly > live with but obviously even less on a P2 > > It's a beta version at the moment but it's surprisingly stable for that. > > I KNOW some of you guys are going to LOVE this thing. > > Naturally I've asked for longer delays and the author seems amenable > check it out > www.audiomulch.com > > No I'm not working for the guy I'm just SOOOO impressed! > > Gareth > > > Which -- if any -- of these boxes will let you play multiple loops > > simultaneously? I don't mean layering on one loop and then clicking > > to a parallel, but unrelated loop for another section. I mean having > > loops 1 - 2 - 3 - 4... running simultaneously in parallel, and being > > able to turn off #2 for a couple passes, then bring it back in and > > turn off #4, etc. You know, like an 8-track mixer with track mute > > buttons, or like a sampler where you can trigger multiple samples > > while others are playing. > >> > > > ... I don't mean layering on one loop and then clicking to a > parallel, but > > > unrelated loop for another section. I mean having loops 1 - > 2 - 3 - 4... > > > running simultaneously in parallel, and being able to turn > off #2 for a couple > > > passes, then bring it back in and turn off #4, etc. You > know, like an > >