Re: To VLZ or not to VLZ! (OT)

[Jim Coker <jcoker@magelang.com>]

granmamas has an overpriced used non-VLZ someone may
want to negotiate for. (www.grandmas.com)

Dennis W. Leas wrote:
> 
> I don't have a Mackie but I've been think of getting a 1604 lately so 
>I've
> been doing some reading.  Have you checked out the 1604 VLZ-Pro?  It's a 
>VLZ
> with a better mic preamp.  More headroom is the new feature, I think.  I 
>was
> talking to the folks at Sweetwater Audio yesterday and they have them in
> stock now.
> 
> Can you get non-VLZ's anymore?
> 
> Dennis Leas
> -----------------------------
> dennis@mdbs.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ur eye <ureye@hotmail.com>
> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com>
> Date: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 11:17 AM
> Subject: To VLZ or not to VLZ! (OT)
> 
> >Sorry, but you guys are my favorite...I have outgrown my 1202 and am
> >trying to decide on the 1604 models. Is there a considerable sound
> >difference between the 2 and would it matter if a I were NOT doing
> >"professional" recording? What about routing options of which I am more
> >interested in. I'm assuming the non-VLZ has 4(6) aux sends. Is it worth
> >the $. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> >Dennis
> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >