Re: Save the Echo Plex and a Joycean digression

["sandro" <sscoccia@ma.ultranet.com>]

let me add my 2 cents to this.
have you noticed that the JamMan sells [used] more that the price you would
have paid for a new one. Maybe Lexicon and Oberheim/Opcode/Gibson should
think about this
sandro

----------
>From: "Sean Witters" <seanwitters@hotmail.com>
>To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
>Subject: Save the Echo Plex and a Joycean digression
>Date: Thu, May 27, 1999, 10:06 AM
>

> I'm a Jam Man user myself, but I would hate to see the Echo Plex go the 
>way
> of Sellon's masterpiece.  Kim, since you are running this show, why don't
> you put together an e-petition here on Loopers Delight to send to Opcode.
> It would also be a fine idea to include desired modifications.  If we 
>could
> send in a serious looking proposal/petition it might shore up any leaks 
>in
> Opcode/Gibson's confidence.  Lexicon abandoned the Jam Man because they 
>had
> little faith in it's vaibility as a profitable item.  I'm sure that 
>similar
> doubts are being harbored by Opcode, after all as much as we love our
> loopers, they are a niche product in many ways.  Not that they should be,
> but not everyone is interested "in that other word".  (Pardon the 
>literary
> reference, the quatation is from Leopold Bloom's letter in Ulysses.  
>Bloom
> means to write "other world" but instead leaves us to contemplate "other
> words".  Pardon the Joyce refrence but Faulkner was noted the other day 
>as a
> looper and if we are going to invoke literary loopers Joyce must be
> mentioned.  I've actually Looped readings of the Molly Bloom chapter 
>which
> is terribly appropriate since the symbol for the chapter is a lazy 8 and 
>its
> text is designed as an infinite loop of doubt and 
>reconciliation.)...Pardon
> the parenthentical digression, save the Echo Plex.
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
>