Support |
At 05:13 PM 6/7/99 -0500, you wrote: >-----Original Message----- >>I'm opposed to classifying music at all. > >Amen! The best music store I've seen, regarding "classifying" music, was >one in Austin, TX. I can't remember the name of it, but they didn't >classify anything! I LIKED IT! > >Dennis Leas >----------------------------- >dennis@mdbs.com > Would that be Waterloo Records? It's a huge place in Austin, and they don't classify anything (except movie soundtracks, as I recall). For browsing, it's a pain in the ass, because you have to sift through all the hillbilly music, derivative top 40 crap, etc. For practical purposes like browsing, one can argue that a certain level of categorization is preferal, even if it means the usual misclassification. (like calling Kenny G jazz). Always two sides to every argument. . . .except the exploitative sides of capitalism (Hah!) Michael. ================================================================ Dr. Michael S. Yoder Assistant Professor of Geography, Coordinator of Urban Studies Department of Social Sciences Texas A&M International University Laredo, TX 78041 U.S.A. Telephone: (956)326-2634 Office; (956)326-2464 FAX E-Mail myoder@tamiu.edu Web Page: http://tamiu.edu/~myoder/ ================================================================ "English ideas about property have given us both the Bill of Rights and the industrial slum." (Archibald C. Coolidge, Jr.)