Support |
Audio Technica AT 801 and the 702 are a good combo--l like the $250 or so 801 better than the 100-300$ Sony stereo mics also use a pair of the $35 each AT 35 lavaliers from Best Buy for stereo and mono sound seeking (they're chiclet sized and sound OK) yes, the mic pre sucks--I use it anyway for now--someone suggested the Sampson Mixpad 4 with batteries for cheap semi-portable mic pres I travel with my 702 alot and it's great transporting a dozen or so recordings (including the Torn and Squarepusher that my sweetie don't dig), a few blank discs, the AT 35's, spare Li battery and a pair of Sony ear buds in a 3x5x7" nylon pouch As far as the sound quality of the ATRAC compression, I think it sounds pretty good, but I've seen posts from folks recording massed strings and bagpipes who complained of distortion Tom Lambrecht hideo@concentric.net BTW thanks loads for all those ## VORTEX ## tips -----Original Message----- From: SoundFNR@aol.com <SoundFNR@aol.com> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> Date: Saturday, August 28, 1999 8:48 AM Subject: Re: Non loop related- recorders >In a message dated 26/08/99 19:23:22 GMT Daylight Time, >clifsound@mediaone.net writes: > >> onsensus on what everyone uses to record live shows- it needs to be >small >and >> stereo- Mini disc or other- and what type of stereo mic > >Sennheiser MKE 66 stereo mike & Sony MZ-R35 = good result. >the mic's a bit pricey though. > > >Beware the mic input on the Sharp 702 is it's weak link. >a rather poor mic pre-amp which colours the sound quite badly(IMHP), >..It's brilliant if you use an external pre-amp ( or mixer) into the line IP. > >I actually bought the 702, but when it wouldn't work there were no >replacements in the shop , so they gave me the Sony instead. > > >Sometimes I think the digital compression loses things (including stuff I >could hear through the headphones during recording) >..but for the money and conveniance you can't beat em. > >Andy Butler > > >