Support |
>IMHO: If you have the choice between D->D copying or >D->A->D ALWAYS take the D->D copy. You may not notice >a great deal of generation loss at first, but it's there. well, there will be generational loss even in an uncompressed digital transfer, due to jitter or just errors. the error correction will handle *nearly all* of them... >going through a >digital:analog converter, and then back again analog:digital >gives you a much wider sensitivity to distortion, hiss, electronic >buzz much as I love digital, I can't really agree with this. if your levels are set properly, there should be little or no noise added. the d/a/d sections on a professional or semi-professional machine will be better than 90dB, so if they were the only problem you could make a hundred generations before getting to the level of an analog mastering deck or a million generations before getting down to the level of a good cassette deck. You'd be much more likely to get noise from other sources interfering with your copies between the two conversion sections. > >Test the theory if you must.. Take 2 Sony MD's, go line-out to line-in >and make a copy. Turn it around and copy the copy, again, again, >again until you hear the hiss. Now try it digital -> digital and note >that the sound never alters from the original. > >Ken