Support |
Well, I don't mean to use it as a looping device, but as a place to record "live" looping, from which to take parts for further work, etc., remix, sampling, Acidising, etc., which requires a lot more quality than a common cassette recorder. I wanted to know if that digital VCR would be of better quality than the trusty old Hi-Fi VCRs. | Before affordable digital workstations came along, folks | were using their CD-Quality Hi-Fi Stereo VCRs as direct | two-track recorders, utilizing just the audio tracks. | | I imagine the specs are even better today. But since I can't | even program the damn clock, fat chance I'd use mine as a looper. :) | | - Larry | | >I would like to request of those loopers who are knowledgeable | of VCR and | >VCR recording for audio purposes -- loop audio of course -- to | review the | >specs on this digital VCR that I've come to know about. I've | copied the | >specs on a page in my website: | > | >http://www.gnominus.org/toss/digital_VCR.html | > | >I don't know what makes a VCR digital, does that mean it | records digitally? | >It seems this thing, if it records digitally, would turn out | to be one hell | >of a mixing deck, no? ...for the price, I mean. I'm getting what looks | like | >a good deal for this at http://shop.theglobe.com. | > | > | |