Support |
>Do the other Macintosh music software developers who incorporated OMS >support into their applications deserve to be left in the dark about >OMS's future now that Opcode clearly can no longer maintain it? I understood that OMS is Apples now and called Open Music System (as oposed to Opcode MS) - I may be wrong I am mainly concerned about MAX which is a unique product with great future (maybe not comercially, but for creativity). I hope someone takes that over. If I were one of the remaining Sequencer soft enterprises, I would create a Vision2xx converter and a decent offer to catch the Vision users... >I've heard that the turnover among Gibson executives may be as high >as 75% a year. Forget warm and fuzzy; is that a healthy, normal, >capitalistic business? Horrible really, a tremendous waist of learning time, disrespecting the human needs to develop methods, work spaces and colaboration with colegues. Constancy seams to have no value in this system - I hope this failure is not deadly for the system... But then again, is it possible that the Gibson managers never thought of this? ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org