Support |
well i agree with the concept that a studio recording is an entirely different beast from a live concert. i often enjoy freak schtuff (e.g. free jazz, experimental electronics) much more in concert than a "document" of the same. i would add another band to the list that really has it down in terms of being able to rock in concert while still putting out great studio recordings: MOUSE ON MARS yes they LOOP - although not with "loopers" per se, but with sequencer-samplers. they're very inventive and have a subtle sense of humour. live they add a drummer to the melange and man does that motherf*#ker rock! in concert you've got to go for the throat a little more - someone should tell this to tortoise! tortoise are an example of a band who can replicate their studio recordings perfectly on stage - but with no fun. they're just way too careful. concerning other points: - fred frith's guitar quartet is also great live - bill frisell is really rockin - his chair that is - his new material has lost its relevancy for me - as a non-american, i really can't stand all this "americana" schtick - a little too sentimental and nostalgic for my taste - all that negativity said, we're all allowed to change course blather, blather: rob Mike Biffle schrieb: > > That said though, I really get into Mr. Bungle's records and I've > never seen them live. They edit and otherwise manipulate their stuff > a lot though and work on making the recording pretty exciting, unlike > Brotzmann, Bailey, and other improvisors who use the recording more > like a document. > > I was surprised to find that they executed many of the bizarre > dynamic, melodic, and rythymic flash cuts from their recordings with > as much or more effect live. With a super loud top volume their > dynamics were quite visceral... and scary. Patton and co. lull you > with some lush vocal harmony and then sledgehammer you with brutal > ring modulated shrieking and shred metal guitar and synth noise... > They're the best I've ever seen at that level of integration. > > > So anyway, what I've found is that the "pure" approach works best > live and the studio is good for tweaking so things sound good without > that live improvisational element, which > probably isn't capturable on record. I'm interested in how other > people approach this. > > Like I said earlier... Bungle's records, while interesting, aren't > quite the experience of them live. And they definitely push the limits > of what transfers from the studio to the stage. > > Miles Davis and Teo Macero did a pretty nice job of taking live > moments and "studioizing" them. > > Fred Frith is another who seems to capture his live "spirit" on tape > fairly well. Guitar Solos is a walk on the razors edge... > > Nels Cline Trio is also quite a ride... It's surprising how much > interplay there is in that ensemble and how well it translates to a > studio document. I'd love to see them live... They do some pretty > radical flash-cut transitions live as well... > > Also... is anybody else thinking that Bill Frissells laid back stuff > just ain't getting there anymore? (Just an opinion... to his credit, > he's still throwing loops out there. 8-b) > > Best Regards, > Miko Biffle, mbiffle@svg.com > "Running scared from all the usual distractions..."