Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
----- Original Message ----- To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 6:22 PM Subject: Re: undesired posts > Sorry you feel that way but > I didn't subscribe to Bill Fox's email list. > I shouldn't have to setup rules to block unsolicited email as a result of > one list subscription. > If many wrote in favour fine they are entitled to their opinion and what > goes in their inbox. > I don't consider it unfriendly, it was meant to be assertive not unfriendly > and it was my second request. > Putting the details in the topic is a good idea giving reader's the >option > to read what is of interest or delete. > See attachment for an example of stuff I can't see the point in sending? > Steven > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthias Grob" <matthias@grob.org> > To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 8:43 AM > Subject: undesired posts > > > > >Bill Fox, > > > Can you unsubscribe me from this spam > > > > > >I don't live in USA and I don't want to receive this. > > > 2nd request. > > >I suscribed to Kims list BUT not yours. > > >Steven > > > > I find this unfriendly, Steven. We discussed it and many wrote in > > favour to Bills posting. > > I dont live in US either and there are many anouncements for shows > > that I could never go, but I still find it interesting to know whats > > happening. > > > > So I find Petr's apology rather unnecessary: > > > > >I am sorry if I was crossed over the line. I saw announcements of > various > > >gigs on the list many times before, so I did it too. I thought the line > is > > >whether the gig is about looping or not. If I caused "bad taste" to > anyone, > > >I apologize. > > > > as someone said: Post what you want, but think well about the subject > > you put so we can select what we are going to read... > > > > no violence > > Matthias > > > > > > ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org > > > > >
- To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com
- From: Jeff Yost <yostie@ezworks.net>
- Subject: Re: creativity creativity
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:09:42 -0400
I was thinking I was thinking I was thinking I was thinking We could loop it I was thinking I was thinking We could loop it We could loop it I was thinking I was thinking We could loop it I was thinking I was looping We could think it I was looping I was looping I was looping I was loop it I was loop it I was loop it thinking thinking looping thinking looping thinking I was could it I was could it looping thinking thinking looping could it could it I was could it it was could I I was loop it thinking thinking loop it loop it could I could I thinking looping looping could I could I think it think it looping looping looping I was thinking thinking could I could I think it looping thinking thinking could I could I loop it thinking thinking looping looping think I think I loop a looping think a could I loop a thinking I was looping looping looping Think a I was was a thinking thinking thinking loop a I was looping thinking thinking I was looping looping I was looping thinking thinking I was I was I was loop I was looping I was thinking I was could I could I thinking I was loop I think I was loop think ing I was was was was was was loop loop loop think I was think loop was I think loop could ... ... ... jeff rich wrote: > > >1. graphs > > -when I feel limited in a particular piece I'll often work from a >graph. > >for instance, my ambient project used to play a chart of stock market > >returns over the past 50 years. very fun! we would "notate" the graph >with > >colors for moods (blue=sad, red=intense, green=layered, etc) and >indicate > >how long (length of time) each section would roughly take. some great > >results with this one. > > I had a couple of interesting performances a few years ago based on this > idea. The performance was called Kaballah Clocks and it was a half hour > piece, based tonally on the 10 'stations' of the mystical Kaballah. Each > station has a 'color' associated with it. Color resonates at a certain > light frequency, and we associated those (angstrom?) frequencies with Hz > frequencies of sound, so each 'station' had a tonal drone that we > improvised within. Each member of the ensemble had a clock in front of > them and we played in each 'station' for 3 minutes, and then mutated to >the > next, and to the next, culminating at the top station of the Kaballah, > associated with Brilliant White light. > > Definitely a noisy piece, but what a crescendo! We were purely > improvising, and made no grandiose pretensions about how good the piece >was > going to be. Afterwards, though, we had people coming up and saying how > amazing it was, and that they had drifted off into some state of >meditation > during the piece, even though we had not introduced it in any way...it >just > was the end of our set. > > Super fun and musically/experimentally/spiritually rewarding > > rich