Re: Loops & Feedback

[lindsay@pavestone.com]

I suppose I wasn't clear.  In reversing the patching, reverse all of it,
putting the RM behind the delay.  Dry signal as carrier, delay as
modulated.  I guess that really only gets you a modulated delay signal, but
it is modulated by its former self, hence helping to rule the universe,
which was the stated objective.




                                                                           
                 
                    SoundFNR@aol.                                          
                 
                    com                  To:     
Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com        
                                         cc:                               
                 
                    12/12/00             Subject:     Re: Loops & Feedback 
                 
                    12:00 PM                                               
                 
                    Please                                                 
                 
                    respond to                                             
                 
                    Loopers-Delig                                          
                 
                    ht                                                     
                 
                                                                           
                 
                                                                           
                 



> Why not reverse your patching?  Let the original signal be the carrier
and
>  the delay signal be the one modulated.  Add some dry direct signal to
the
>  output.  I wish I had a RM to try this with...
This wouldn't work either though
............Think about it.
Andy Butler
<A HREF="http://members.aol.com/soundfnr/vortex.htm">Lexicon Vortex
Database
</A>