| Support |  |       | 
>Power supply? bullshit...The demo guy said "We totally 
>underestimated the complexity of this machine".
hmm... we did not really beleave the supply story, did we?
>Only one loop was active, and only two tracks of that one loop were 
>available.
uau! So please dont make another war if the soft is not ready in march!
I had a loop going in the loop delay after a month, and after a year 
it was as bug free as you heard about :-) ... well, I had no 
experience either...
>Yay! two loops going simultaneously.  hit the pitch button, engage 
>track one and alter the pitch of track one up an octave.  Pitch is 
>shown on the front panel in semitones.
awsome... I wait for one of those...
>The time stretching is quite dramatic.  I originally recorded at 120 
>bpm, and you can go down to like, 4 bpm, which introduced possibly 
>interesting artifacts, especially if post-processed.  think fat boy 
>slim, here...
I especially wonder whether a slight stretching introduces no artefacts? 
;-)
>One of the more interesting things i saw in the demo they did was 
>that the pitch shifting can be preprogrammed, so when you lay that 
>guitar riff in, what comes out on the first playback of the loop IS 
>PITCHSHIFTED.  cool.  you don't have to wait for playback and then 
>adjust pitch.
AMS did that in the early eighties, but it costed twenty times more!
>so if anyone has very specific questions of something i can try out 
>for ya, let me know.
yes, please, connect to a clock source and change the speed a bit to 
see whether the loop realy follows exactly without artefacts, that 
would be my favourite feature!
I am somewhat tired of the constant speed loops, the "beat prison".
-- 
          ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org