RE: Sync (was Re: Any More Info on New BOSS Looping pedal)

[Rod Morgan <Rmorgan@harman-const.com>]

What's anyone kmow about the Electrix Repeater?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Moore [mailto:tony-moore@juno.com]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 4:12 PM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: Sync (was Re: Any More Info on New BOSS Looping pedal)


little non-synch loopers like the dl4, headrush, this new boss thingy,
etc work great before a synched looper (jamman, edp)  for pre-synch
looping and like eric p says, 'making little floating loops'.

never met a looper yet i didn't like :-)

tony
6 loopers and counting...

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:24:59 -0800 "Mark Hamburg" <mhamburg@Adobe.COM>
writes:
> The BOSS pedal probably gets a pass from me on this one (as does the 
> DL-4)
> since it doesn't have MIDI input. On the other hand, the GP-100 does 
> raise
> my ire in this regard.
> 
> Mark
> 
> At 11:19 AM -0800 1/26/01, Mark Sottilaro wrote:
> >I totally agree.  I almost can't believe that a company like Roland 
> would
> >forget a very important feature like this one.  Also, NO FADE?  
> What the hell
> >are they thinking?  If anyone from Roland is on this list: Do what 
> ever it
> >takes to add midi synch and a fade to your unit, and you'll open it 
> up to many
> >more customers.  (like me!)
> >
> >Mark (a different one)
> >
> >Mark Hamburg wrote:
> >
> >> Pet Peeve: Devices with MIDI inputs and tap tempo that can't sync 
> to MIDI
> >> clock.
> >>
> >> All the pieces are there. Well, almost since you may need a way 
> to specify
> >> how many clock ticks per tap but that could be handled in a 
> variety of ways.
> >>
> >> I've got too many devices that are subject to this limitation for 
> it to be
> >> at all amusing.
> >>
> >> Mark
> 
> 
>