Re: "out" music = derivitive of jazz?

["Michael LaMeyer" <mlameyer@rcn.com>]

Having said that.  I'm curious as to what y'all think of this
fella's stuff in the context of our discussion.  Experimental?
Seems like it.  Jazz influenced? hmmmmm

http://artists.mp3s.com/artists/7/notlad.html

(Don't know the guy myself)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael LaMeyer" <mlameyer@rcn.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: "out" music = derivitive of jazz?


> Naw, I think there's also Shoenberg, Eno, and even Aphex Twin
> and other folks too that have had a sizable influence or at
> least played in the same sand box (wittingly or unwittingly).
I
> suppose it's just a matter of your definition.  This
> "new/creative" music we speak of may be only for those "60's
> jazz" influenced ideas.
>
> An atonal inprove by any other name ...
>
> Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paolo Valladolid" <phv40@hotmail.com>
> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:54 AM
> Subject: Re: "out" music = derivitive of jazz?
>
>
> > From:  "matt davignon" <mattdavignon@hotmail.com>
> > To:  Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> > Subject:  "out" music = derivitive of jazz?
> > Date:  Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:21:24 -0800
> >
> > Sure, I can see how many of the groups and musicians that
were
> listed on the
> > original post (Thrill Jockey, Masada, Zorn, Tom Waits,
etc...)
> come from a
> > jazz background, but not everything that's "new" and "out
> there" is derived
> > particularly from a few jazz albums released in the 60's, is
> it?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > Me:
> >
> > Yup.
> >
> > Paolo
> >
> >
>
________________________________________________________________
> _
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com
> >
>
>