Support |
Andre, Thanks for the info! I just tried it -works fine. The ending w/ > "Record." (Do NOT end this function with "Multiply" a second time.)< is the tidbit I overlooked initially (I need to read things twice!;-) Definately opens up a new dimension... BTW & slightly OT: Yesterday at sunset I rode my fixed (bike) down to Chapman School in NW Portland to watch the Vaux Swifts LOOP and spiral their 1000+ group down into the large octagonal chimney for the night. Whoa! It's a favorite autumn activity for me - these little birds put on quite a show, the large swirl a mesmorizing choreography. I guess it's a gathering of tribes for them, collecting before migrating south. They look like swallows, but evidently one difference is that their wings flap one at a time...one's up while the other is down (a little to quickly to discern). David Andre LaFosse <altruist@altruistmusic.com> said: > Hi David, > > DaViD AuKeR wrote: > > > > It allows you to pick out a small section of of a larger loop, loop >it, do > > > anything you want with it, then if you like you can go back to the >original > > > loop. > > > > > > > Andy, Kim, et al.: HOW IS THAT DONE? How would the appropiate > > parameters be set to accomplish that? > > 1) Set Quantize to OFF > > 2) At the precise point in the original loop that you want to extract a > new smaller section from, press "Multiply." > > 3) At the precise point that you want the new, smaller section to end, > press "Record." (Do NOT end this function with "Multiply" a second >time.) > > You should now have a new, shorter loop. > > If you want to go back to the original loop, you could use UNDO, > although it's possible that you could use up too much memory in > subsequent operations to be able to return completely to the original >loop. > > One way to avoid this would be to use multiple loops: before you extract > the shorter loop (in the three-step example above), copy the original > loop to a new loop location. Then perform the edits on the copied loop. > If you want to go back to the original loop, it's already stored in a > seperate location. > > Hope that helps, > > --Andre