Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I don't really think so. I think we can all agree that Dave is a pretty good guy, and even though he's endorsing this product, I honestly don't think he would if he really didn't use it. Also, I think he didn't bother restating negative points on the Repeater, as others had already. I found it interesting that either reviews were glowing, or trashing. I submitted my own review that I think is somewhere in the middle. I think if I knew that the Repeater would remain the way it is now FOREVER, I would probably have returned it, as I really think the MIDI bugs are inexcusable. 10 months beta testing and no one tried to synch a loop via midi? I know Dave must have signed a non disclosure agreement with Electrix, which is why we did not here much from him during the development process. Electrix has made claims that a bug fix is due "soon" Perhaps they knew of the MIDI bug and the Loop Point Assist bug, but felt another month of delay would be out of the question. 99.9% of what I do with my looper is based on decent MIDI synch, so it's a VERY big deal to me. People like DJs or freeform sound collage artists, might not care at all about these bugs, but I'm confident that Electrix will make the Repeater behave the way it was advertised. Mark Sottilaro Stan Card wrote: > yeah, it is but isnt this a conflict of interest goin on here...(just > askin)? > stanner > > on 9/19/01 2:01 PM, hutton at hutton@pathcom.com wrote: > > > Thanks for the imfo. ........ Very insightful! > > "Liebig, Steuart A." wrote: > > > > howdy, > > for what it's worth . . . > > mr torn has reviewed the repeater on > harmony-central. i don't remember him really > giving much of his take on it on this list. > > in any event, i think it gives a slightly > different slant on the box. > > here's the link, it's (as of right now) the first > review on the page. > > > >ttp://harmony-central.com/Effects/Data/Electrix/Repeater-01.html > > stig >