Re: on octave dividing

[jim palmer <jimp@pobox.com>]

ok, i did this in sound forge and heard for myself.
without the inversion of the second half you get an octave up.
i was fooled by the spikes in the middle of each half wave.
thanks.

> At 08:28 AM 9/24/2001, jim palmer wrote:
> >isn't that an octave up instead of down?
> 
> 
> no, invert it back at each of those inflection points to get the 
>original 
> waveform:
> 
...
> 
> this is now two periods, so this original is an octave higher than the 
> octave divided output below.
> 
> kim
> 
>