Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I'm curious as to how much "sweetener" is required by management as opposed to the band themselves *wanting* to fix some glitches.
** sure. but in the case of a band like u2, do they even need to "listen to their management" in this case??? i dunno, i just think live albums should be documents of the live experience . . . not something that's been airbrushed. tome that comes down to ego and/or dishonesty (ymmv).
(good for the doors.)
stig
Case in point: The Doors; BACKSTAGE AND DANGEROUS: THE PRIVATE REHEARSAL. This was album is culled from one of those fixing dates. The idea was to leave all the gear set up after the show, and come back the next day. This way, the band could sound pretty much the same acoustically. However, the Doors didn't like the idea of altering the live album, and sabotaged the recording session. The result is a lot of fun to listen to, although it took 30 some odd years to be released to the public.
Confidentiality Warning: This e-mail contains information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any dissemination, publication or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. The sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss, disruption or damage to your data or computer system that may occur while using data contained in, or transmitted with, this e-mail. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail. Thank you.