Re: ambient then rhythmic?

[Hedewa7@aol.com]

 PMimlitsch@aol.com writes:

>Does this mean, then, that the "under" loops are now truncated to the new
>rythmic loop? 
yes.
 
>Or, as I had interpreted the desired result of original
>question,  will the "under" loops float about independantly under this
>new rythmn?
correct me if i'm wrong, here, but you'd need a second *independent* 
device 
for that..... 
best,
dt / splattercell
imi-ibi