Support |
>jim palmer wrote: >>this desire for perfect specificity in language may be somewhat >misguided. and, zvonar@zvonar.com replied: >It's often a matter of style, eh? i think so. 'perfect specificity', as regards language, seems -(at least)- both in the mouth of the speaker and the ear of the hearer. sometimes, 'creative' (ie, personal, or idiosyncratic) abuse of the spoken word can be the quickering path for the transmission of intention..... dt / splattercell