Support |
> <smile> -just my opinion of course, but I think there's alot more >going >on in the original post than a discussion of feedback. -but, lol! since >we're on the subject of feedback and the DL-4 in particular, the CD I >recently did contains mostly older material which was completely done on a >DL-4 which evolves as any other fadable looper might allow for. part of >this comes from me, always adding new material along with the loop almost >constantly. -aside from soloing and such. I agree that the lack of >feedback control is a hinderence, and to me at least, a big annoyance, but >it still works wonderfully in my opinion. <smile> I love the little >thing!!! lol! > Anyway, I wish I could upload the two pieces I'm talking about >somewhere, >but alas, until I come up with more webspace I cannot. <smile> -You'll >just have to trust me I guess. lol! nono, you can upload to my site, I was just lazy about it, but dont mail music to me, I will send you the FTP info... > Anyway, just my thoughts, and have a wonderful day!... > >Smiles, > >CQ Ok, once again I was speaking about things I dont understand, since I never tried a DL4! So I am happy to hear that its potential is better than the bible's ;-) And to leave it clearer maybe: The FB-evolution-dynamic thing is MY mission. So I keep talking about it an doing it. If yours is a different one, the better! Do that and I listen and learn from it! -- ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org