Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
I have the same issue. To make matters worse, part of my "style" has become using the Repeater's effects loop to be able to play dry (well, somewhat dry...) into the Repeater, then have only what's in the loop be effected by what's in the effects loop. Very useful. I'm sure the same could be done with two EDPs and a programmable patchbay, but there's not the cash for that right now. Basically, I'm planning on using the EDP for live gigs where stereo isn't an issue, and the Repeater in the studio where it's more effective. I'm still hashing this out. Mark Sottilaro On Wednesday, August 21, 2002, at 07:55 PM, M. Steven Ginn wrote: > Most of what I have read about effects routing and the EDP recommend > running an effects processor first and then through the EDP. If this is > the case then what is needed to say go into an Eclipse effects processor > in stereo, come out of the Eclipse and split the signal so that it not > only goes back to the main mix bus (aux return, etc.), it also goes into > a stereo to mono adapter/combiner of some sort to go into the EDP? Then > I guess I will come out the EDP back to the main mix where the original, > effects and EDP signals are combined. I am on the right track here, or > am I making it too complicated? Kim said that if I were to put the > Eclipse at the end of the signal path and apply effects to the dry mix > and the EDP return, it would probably get a bit muddy. The main thing > about my mix is that everything I have is stereo and can be routed > stereo, except for the EDP. I wish I could afford another one and solve > my problem that way, but that's not possible right now. > > Thanks, > > M. Steven Ginn > > ******************************** > Please go to > <www.SeptemberRising.org> > Listen to the music. > Purchase the CD > Support the NY Firefighters > 9/11 Relief Fund > ******************************** > >