Support |
Slightly OT; but within the realm of tonal palette: I made my acoustic guitar sound like a choir singing last night with nothing more than my EDP and my slide. jeff On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 15:47, sine@zerocrossing.net wrote: > As a guitar synth guy I have to totally disagree. Why would looping >synths > be bad? Why would any instrument or sound be bad? Why should I care if > someone says, "Oh, a synthesizer"? I notice when I'm among a bunch of > musicians they probably think as you do. In the rest of the world, I >find > that people could care less. They either like what they're hearing, or >they > don't. > > Bill Walker is another guitar synth guy that loops his GR-30 sounds. I >love > his music. Andre Lafosse loops the dry output of his Steinberger and >goes > directly into a small tube amp. I love his music. Why would one judge > either's process? > > I'll also counter your statement about synths winning out over loopers >for > sonic manipulation. Are loopers for sonic manipulation? I thought they >were > to loop audio. It goes back to my "Looper as processor (not effect)" > thread. Some choose to process their audio with a looper, like Andre, >while > people like me tend to process their audio first then loop it rather >simply. > > Is there a better way? Not in my opinion. > > Mark Sottilaro > > Mark Hamburg wrote: > > > I'm going to try out a proposition here. I wouldn't say I actually >believe > > it, but it's a mildly provocative thought and lord knows this list >needs > > provocation. > > > > Synths are bad for looping. > > > > Why? > > > > As anyone who has been to a loopfest will report, odd noises and sonic > > manipulation tend to be in abundance. Arguably, that's one of the >things a > > looper is good for. > > > > Now, when people hear such noises, they probably just think "Oh. A > > synthesizer." > > > > Guitar synths make matters worse. If a guitar player is looking to >expand > > his or her tonal palette, a guitar synth will probably win out over a > > looper. > >