Support |
I spoke about Mark of the Unicorn's POLAR (not an add on to Digital Performer 2.5 or higher, but a free part of the program itself. It's a RAM based real-time loop recorder) and I feel it's a good time to talk about it in this light. I've barely scratched the surface of it, but so far it seems like an amazing tool for creating evolving loops Each pass can be saved as a separate file, "printed" to the hard drive from the loop that resides in RAM. Now this is why I've got a gig and a half of RAM! You can control the volume of each pass in real time, but there's no feedback control per say. I'm going to go back and figure out if you can automate the volume of each pass to simulate feedback, but with having all the old passes still there, but eventually hitting a level of 0. Has any POLAR user tried this? If I can get it to work this way, I think POLAR will be one of the most useful looping tools on the market and a great way to "save" your loops, but to at the same time have the evolution that Kim spoke of. I love the Zen like nature of dispersing my little moving electrons back into chaos, but my wife always says, "That was beautiful. Did you record it?" Consequently, I do not have much recorded material. This might be a way to get the best of both worlds. So what I'm basically saying is this: If you're a looper looking for a Hard Disk recording system (mac only, sorry PC guys), take a serious look at MOTU's Digital Performer 3. I bought it because it seemed the only game in town (for the Mac OS) where you could get robust software, high end audio hardware and MIDI hardware all made by the same company. I still like it for that, but now, I've got a software based looping system that could very well change the way I record music. For no additional cost! They're also working on an OSX version, so it can only get better. Mark Sottilaro