Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Quoting mark <sine@zerocrossing.net>: > On Wednesday, April 9, 2003, at 02:10 PM, Eric Williamson wrote: > > when i had a vortex i used it in both places, via the Repeater's ill- > > implemented FX Insert function. > Ill implemented? Seems like an amazing feature to me that always seems i say ill implemented because they didn't have the time to provide any level control for the insert, but did take the time to _make_sure_ you could NEVER use Resample to recursively process through the FX insert. it looks like you could use it for that, and that's the _easiest_ and least process-intensive way to implement resampling. but when i think of all the r/d time wasted on writing that buffering code (and memory wasted to execute the operation), it really burns me they wasted all this time with LPA and a castrated re-sample. if Resample let you continue to resample after the loop-point ended (instead of buffering the last cycle), i wouldn't be selling my Repeater this weekend: i'd be selling my Prodigy to buy another one. remember: i'm not expecting a "weird" feature. recursive resampling _should_ be expected if resample allows you to go beyond one complete cycle. i am rambling on 3 hours sleep, so please let me know if i make no sense :) > So, I actually got the MPX1 to replace the Vortex, and to be honest, > I've never looked back. If you're low on cash and looking for an sounds like a keeper to me. something that kind of kept me from really exploiting the Vortex is that i never _really_ understood what was going on. thanks for the input! looks like i'll be selling some stuff to buy an mpx-1 ... --- Eric Williamson www.suitandtieguy.com ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/