Support |
He didn't say what century he got his motherboard in. Think first, yes? > they don't put cache on motherboards anymore, it's integrated in the CPU. > what century are you in? > > more likely the difference is from the FSB frequency, memory frequency >and > type, and the chipset used. Chipsets can have a lot of variation in > performance. It can also depend on how many other devices you have > competing for bandwidth on the PCI bus. > > kim > > At 03:48 AM 4/23/2003, Steve Goodman wrote: > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Jesse Ray Lucas" <jlucas@neoprimitive.net> > > > If you're doing hard disk recording on Windows XP you might check out this > > > site for some performance tweaks: > > > > > > http://www.musicxp.net > > > > > > My latency was 11ms before. After the tweaks I got it down to 5ms. It'll > > > almost do 3ms, but not quite. > > > > > > Aardvark claims 1.5ms latency on a 1.5Ghz machine, but mine's a 1.7Ghz. > > > Maybe it's the AMD CPU??? Does RAM affect latency? > > > >If there's not enough of it it does. What's the motherboard you're using? > >Its cache size can affect everything. > > > >Steve Goodman > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Kim Flint | Looper's Delight > kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com > > > > >