Support |
> > For a short time I did run an EDP and a Repeater at the same time, and > I found it to be too much. Each unit does PLENTY in my opinion. I > rarely ended up using them both together, but I would imagine like > anything it would need lot's of practice. It always felt like I was > that guy who spins plates on the Ed Sullivan show when I was using > multiple loopers. Too hard to focus on the music, especially in a live > context where things are more chaotic. > In the past, the main use I've found for the two has been to use the Repeater to record grooves - i.e. Bass line + Comping, and then looped the Echoplex on top of it to create the melody for the arrangement. The echoplex loop would be looping a multiple of the Repeater's loop. (You could do the same just with the repeater, but you would have less flexibility, and would be able to do stuff like re-recording the chord progression for the reprise, and then >voila< fade in the original melody from the EDP) Alternately, I would use the echoplex to make shorter loops from sounds on precreated cds, that I would mangle while the repeater kept the progression going in the background. bIz --------------------- www.groovetronica.com - "No offense, but a dated d&b loop with some Holiday Inn lounge singer hardly wows me technically or talent wise, and I could do better with a cassette deck and a microphone." ---------------------