Support |
You would be specializing in Psyclic Wankotronics, right? ;-) (Except that probably messes up the pronunciation.) You are way ahead of me with N.E.W. since I've been since Schoolkids' Records in Ann Arbor had a NEW music section back in the early 1980's. I actually was semi-serious with the over all suggestion of "Cycletronica" if not with the subgenre suggestions. It attempts to move the focus off the process ("live use of a looping tool") and onto the audible results. It distinguishes between cases where loops are being used as part of the background -- e.g., David Torn's really great work on David Bowie's Heathen -- and cases where the cycles are the focus of attention. There is some risk that it leaves in the Acid/Live pre-recorded loop side of things. What those probably lack most of the time is the evolutionary aspect. (I contemplated "evolutionary cycletroncia" but that just seemed like too much of a mouthful.) On the other hand, if there's enough evolution to the cycles or their use, then I don't see a need to exclude that music out of hand. If Matthias and Andre feel they need to spell out aesthetic manifestos that exclude each other, then I'm afraid I can't help there. I'd rather worry about the aesthetic center for Cycletronica than erecting a fence at the perimeter. There's also always the option of attaching additional adjectives. Ambient Cycletronica, Aggressive Psyclotronica, Live Dayglo Green Cyclatronica, etc. I do have to ask myself whether all of the material on my CD actually qualifies as Cycletronica. It's predominantly Cycletronica so that might be enough. The opening and closing pieces, however, have no loops (since I didn't own a looper at the time). On the other hand, they do make use of evolving tone sequences so arguably that would count as well. Judge for yourself. The last track from the CD starts playing by default if you visit my web site (which incidentally labels the music "Ambient Guitar" but may get changed to "Cycletronica" or "Cycletronic Guitar"). Hmm. I devise a name for a genre and then proceed to consider whether I need to exclude myself. Mark http://www.baymoon.com/~mark_hamburg on 6/2/03 10:51 PM, Mark Sottilaro at sine@zerocrossing.net wrote: > I'm in if we can sometimes spell it psyclotronica... like when we're > looping on drugs. (In my mind I'll still consider cycletronica a sub > genera of N.E.W.) > > Mark Sottilaro > > On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 08:18 PM, Mark Hamburg wrote: > >> Cycletronica ( sykletron'ika ) : The music of evolving cycles >> >> alternate spellings: Cyclotronica, Cyclatronica >> >> Subgenres: >> >> Cyclic Wankotronica : Generally a solo endeavor >> Cyclic Jammatronica : A group improvisation form >> >> Mark >> > >