Support |
"The sender appears to be someone from a recognized domain name, such as ibm.com, zdnet.com or microsoft.com. The subject line typically says "Re: Details," "Resume" or "Thank you.". Attachment names may include: your_document.pif, details.pif, your_details.pif, thank_you.pif, movie0045.pif, document_Fall.pif, application.pif, and document_9446.pif. " http://news.com.com/2100-1002_3-5065494.html bIz ------------ http://www.groovetronica.com - "Well, it hasn't made it into our playlist, I'm afraid. It's summer so there are no djs here to listen to and play music, so we're just playing automated music right now." ------------ ----- Original Message ----- From: "msottilaro" <sine@zerocrossing.net> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 1:04 PM Subject: Re: Mark's future looper > On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 08:09 AM, SoundFNR@aol.com wrote: > > > > too lazy to hit Overdub during Record ? :-) > > Yup. Got too much going on playing to want to deal with anything after > the point I tell the loop to start. JamMan spoiled me. > > >> Touch sensitive Jog shuttle. I want to be able to manipulate my > >> loop=20 > >> as one would a record.so how would you like that to sound? > > like a dj lining up the record sort of thing? > > > > I imagine a Kaos pad type controller, where as soon > > as you touch it the loop stops it's normal motion, and > > is "scrubbed" by the motion of your finger on the pad. > > Playback resumes when you remove your finger. > > Yeah, pretty much exactly like that. Think of a record being > scratched. I've been doing this with a Numark Axis 9 CD player, but > you've got to pre-record your loop for that to work. I'd love to have > that functionality on the fly. > > > the difficult concept is combining the multitrack idea (parallel) > > with the EDP type Nextloop concept(serial) > > Well, we're talking the future right? Where everything is possible! > I'd imagine you could have all the serial EDP functions available to > each loop, plus be able to choose to run some of them parallel. > > >> Decay and feedback available to me at all times. Not feedback, > >> which=20 > >> has to wait for the end of a loop to vary the volume, but the > >> ability=20 > >> to have the loop decay gradually at a specified rate. Available > >> while=20= > >> in record, or not in record. Standard EDP style feedback as well. > > > > Does EDP ReplaceMode (Loop/Delay=rPL) cover this? > > I don't know, I'm not an EDP owner. > > Mark Sottilaro > >