Support |
> "For me", a >strictly ambient looping performance is like painting a sky, sea, and >distant range of mountains on the canvas and leaving it at that. "For >me", that is neither "intriguing nor particularly inspiring", but if the >painter goes back and adds some interesting and creative detail, this >means to me that the artist has something to say, >> here I dont agree, creating a cloud is saying something Matthias (and this is a subtle invitation for anyone to discuss music/art aesthetics with me) - how can you agree or disagree with my own subjective response to an ordinary cloud painted on canvas? How is this possible...I'm making a statement about my emotive response to some art, not an objective and empirically verifiable fact about an intrinsic property of that art. This is like disagreeing with m personal claim that I don't like the color blue. :) All in all, however, I understand what you are trying to say here. Sometimes a simple device or bit of artistic expression can be inspiring or interesting to someone. I concede to all exceptions, of course. Cheers, Krispen