Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Cooperman" <coop@newmillguitar.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 5:40 PM Subject: Re: ORGANIC programming and looping > > I still say that you should eat organic lettuce and pronounce it > "lett-toose" > > We must remember that you must sweat to smell and smelling correctly > adds to the overall aesthetic transference. > > Now every body do it "lett-toose, let-toose, let-toose" close the mind > to power outlets and smell from every pore. > > I think there's at least going to be a recount in Ohio. There are > papers filed for nevada and New mexico. You KNOW this was stolen like > 2000. One word for yah: ENDIVE. Go chew on that for a bit, m'kay? Back to being on-topic though. When I think "organic" I think of it only in terms of [1] how the sound is made or [2] how the sound SOUNDS. From the listening standpoint I would think "organic" (which would actually be more quasi-organic) would equate to an effect where one cannot discern the seams of the cloth as it were. I experienced this same effect watching "The Incredibles" this weekend. (Everything looks SO real from the texture etc. standpoint. Gorgeous.) There's a scene where Elastigirl (Holly Hunter's voice as Mom) picks up a 'super suit' off the bed. The cloth-like appearance of the suit was SO ON, I didn't think about it, taking it all for granted the way one does in a good old-style non-effects film. Sometimes I look at stuff like this and think, "Hmm, nice render!", but this time I didn't in the least. Visually flawless. So I suppose I differ from the gear-oriented thinking, in that I only care about what the gear is, what it's doing etc. when I'm either setting it or the looping up or troubleshooting the units. I don't know that I'd ever think about whether anyone was remotely interested in the equipment I use either. :) Stephen Goodman * Cartoons about DVDs and Stuff * http://www.earthlight.net/HiddenTrack