Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
On 18-02-05 18:10, "Jesse Chappell" <essejlc@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:52:35 +0100, Jan A Johnsen <jan@igmbergen.no> >wrote: >> I found the error : ) >> >> When I saw your command lines to be typed in the terminal folder I >realized >> something. I made a folder in my App folder called: Sooperlooper. >> When I removed the app from this folder started Jack and then >SooperLooper >> Everything worked as on my G4. Fantastic. >> I guess my needs to keep my workspace organized got in the way for me. >> I wanted to keep SooperLooper in a folder with the presets ant >txt.files. >> So my problem was that I made a folder within the Applications folder >and >> moved SooperLooper into it. >> By moving SooperLooper out the folder and just let if float in the >> applicationsfolder made it work. > > This really shouldn't be causing a problem. Others have successfully > started it when it sits in a subfolder, *but* if there are any spaces > in a folder name in the path it won't work properly (that is a bug to > be fixed). I will check it out soon. Yes, there was a space in the start like this <space>Sooperlooper Now why would I do that, well my app folder is crowded and I just wanted SL to be on top of the list when ever I opened the App folder. > >> In the future, will it be possible to add a new loop without going into >Jack >> for routing? If Im working on a loop and I want anotherone I add one, no >> sweat : ) when im routing/patching in JACK I get these clicking noises >when >> the routing gets activated. It does not get picked up in the loop, its >just >> some noise that should not be there,I guess. > > Yes, the current version of jack can interrupt the audio stream when > patching connections together. A future version is being tested that > solves that problem. Currently, for flexibility each loop gets its > own ports, so you could route completely different sources/dests > independently for each loop. Sometimes, that much flexibility is too > much, as you've discovered. Would you like to see an option in SL to > always use the same input and output ports for every loop? > To me that sounds like a good idea, and I would use that a lot. For now im running my laptop trough one of the FX loops on my amp And I really donšt need any other input output options for this setup. >> Will a Audio Unit version be tagged to JACK? or would it be >"standalone" as >> without the need of JACK to run? > > The AU plugin version would not use JACK, it would be just like any > other plugin. However, some of the features of the standalone app > will be lost, and it will likely just support a single loop per plugin > instance. > >> Fantastic, and again I really like the GUI : ) > > Thanks for the feedback! > > jlc