Support |
Are you talking about pre-loaded loops? Or do you build the loops during performance? Filling 16 loops of 10 minutes each comes out to a 160 minute performance minimum. At 2006.01.29 10:42 AM, Kevin Goldsmith wrote: >I think it all comes back to a matter of style. I personally would have no >problem filling 16 loops of 10 minutes of length each and using them all >in >performance (although probably not more than a few at the same time. I >have >hit barriers with every piece of loop hardware I have ever used and after >trying to get around it by combining them in multiple ways, I'm just using >software now and that seems to work for me. > > Kevin