|
Support |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kim wrote:
> doesn't replace another. My advice is that you first figure
> out what you want to do with a looper, and then determine
> which looper best fits that use.
I care to disagree here. My advice would be to get a relatively cheap
looper
(or to borrow one from a friend) and figure out what you like and don't
like
about it and which features you find it lacks. Then go for the real thing.
Rainer