Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Hi David, Good idea, but I'm afraid that wouldn't work since the magazine is only publishing on paper. But I, as the writer, can publish a "pirate copy" of the chart without harming any paper issue mag sales. It's on my list. per On 29 mar 2006, at 02.19, David Kirkdorffer wrote: > Perhaps the magazine can reproduce part of the chart and then drive > readers > to its website for the all-inclusive in-depth everything-you-want- > to-know > version? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Per Boysen" <perboysen@gmail.com> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 5:54 PM > Subject: comparison chart of the different loopers (was: Refining > the first > of possibly many stupid questions) > > >> On 29 mar 2006, at 00.28, Richard Sales wrote: >> >>> I'd love to see a comparison chart of the different loopers and >>> what they can and can't do. Does that exist? >> >> I recently did one, but unfortunately in Swedish because it was >> ordered by a Swedish guitar magazine. However, we're not publishing >> until I can get the RC-50 as well into the chart and article, and >> then we're talking late may. If I can find the time I would like to >> translate at least the chart into English and put it online asap. If >> that happens I will notify the list, of course. Fact is I wouldn't >> mind some helpful feedback as well ;-) It's too easy to miss out on >> details that might be more important for other users. And since there >> is not enough room in one chart to list every feature of every >> looper, the real challenge is to decide what to leave out. >> >> Greetings from Sweden >> >> Per Boysen >> www.boysen.se (Swedish) >> www.looproom.com (international) >> http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast? >> id=128679560&s=143456