Support |
--- rune fagereng <rune_fagereng@yahoo.no> wrote: > Hi and thanks ! > > You guys are a head of me. I am just a novise in > this game. No problem, we all start that way. > > But is it difficult to slave the repeater to my pc > with ableton and m-adio ozone workstation ? Yup, I'd just make Ableton the "Master" and the Repeater the "Slave" as Live's sync out seems solid. I just started using Live 5 so I can't think of the exact path to set it to output midi clock, but a quick check of the manual should help... or you can do as I do and poke around until you find it. Perhaps it defaults to sending MIDI clock anyway. I'm not sure. Then set the Repeater to "MIDI" for the sync and you're done. You'll see the Repeater's tempo display go to what Live is set to and viola, you're done. I think you'll find this much, much better than Beat Detect mode and all it will cost you is the price of a midi cable. Mark > > best regards of Rune > > Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> skrev: > On Jul 5, 2006, at 17:10, rune fagereng wrote: > > > Hi ! > > > > I am make songs on my lap top and the repeater. > Beats, basslines on > > the laptop and soundscapes in sync and without > sync on the > > repeater. But still if my beats on the pc are in > 90 bpm and my > > repeater the same, they seam to, over some time, > to loose the sync. > > > > I wander, do the proffs use midisync live ? > > > Hi Rune, > > I didn't understand if you sync the laptop or the > Repeater, but I can > tell you that when I had a Repeater I liked to sync > that machine all > the time. Sometimes an EDP was providing a MIDI > Clock signal and > sometimes a computer was the master - but the > Repeater was always my > sync slave and it did very well. > > But maybe my good experience with the Repeater comes > from the fact > that I play everything live? I mean, if the Repeater > really was > "slow" or "fast" I had no problem with that because > I was listening > and playing in time what was being looped on the > repeater. Quite > often a musical theme, looped into the Repeater, did > not start where > the (Repeater) loop started. This became obvious > when I went "Next > Loop" on the Repeater, but it didn't hurt the music > much IMHO. And of > course, the Repeater doesn't sync correctly during > the time-stretch > phase when you change master tempo (like, I use to > go HalfSpeed on > the EDP which will change the tempo to half as > fast). But personally > I think that sounds cool and I like it as a musical > effect - the > Repeater does after all catch up and lock into the > new tempo in one > or two seconds. I also tried the Beat Sync of the > Repeater and it > worked fine, although you have to help it out now > and then by tapping > the tempo (not all music have that four-on-the-floor > 909 kick ;-) > > So much syncing the Repeater. If you do it the other > way - i.e. > syncing the laptop - I have no tips, because this > comes down to what > software application you are running. > > Greetings from Sweden > > Per Boysen > www.boysen.se (Swedish) > www.looproom.com (international) > http://tinyurl.com/fauvm (podcast) > http://www.myspace.com/looproom > > > > > > > www.runefagereng.com > Mail:rune_fagereng@yahoo.no > Mob: 917 95 867 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com