Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Re: Re: New Boomerang and Blooperang Update...



what is a blooperrang?

On 7/17/06, mark t <aleatoric12@gmail.com> wrote:
> The looper will have true
> >stereo recording, vastly improved audio specs, long record time, 6
> >loops, multi level undo/redo, multiple loops can play synched or
> >unsynched, and a slew of "utility" features such as an octave down
> >effect for creating bass parts, auto fade out, metronome, etc. It
> >will be roughly half the size of the Rang(TM) Plus! We don't have a
> >price yet, but it will be reasonable and maintain the high standard
> >of quality the current Rang(TM) offers.
>
>
> Wow!  Thats impressive,  mutilple loops!  Wow!
>
> On 7/17/06, Krispen Hartung <khartung@cableone.net> wrote:
> > Stereo recording....will that include stereo input/output too? That 
>would be
> > cool. That will make only two that can do this, right? I thought the 
>RC50
> > was stereo i/o as well.
> >
> > It's just amazing how much momentum the looping technology is building
> > now...both software and hardware. It's sort of exciting.
> >
> > Kris
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "mech" <mech@m3ch.net>
> > To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 1:36 AM
> > Subject: New Boomerang and Blooperang Update...
> >
> >
> > >A few days ago, I was getting ready to head out of town for the 2006
> > >Midwest Stick Seminar in Ann Arbor, MI ( http://www.stickfest.org ). 
>Since
> > >I knew there would inevitably be some looping talk (and since I enjoy
> > >endorsing vendors who've been active on this list), I contacted Mike 
>Nelson
> > >at Boomerang Music to see if I could find out any information on the 
>status
> > >of the upcoming Rang(TM) III.
> > >
> > > Most of their reply dovetails the specs Kelly Coyle was kind enough 
>to
> > > post here a couple months back.  I just got home from Ann Arbor this
> > > evening.  So, straight from the source, here's what I got back from 
>Mike &
> > > Lynne (shared with their kind permission, of course):
> > >
> > >>We love to hear from addicted Loopers!.. and very much appreciate 
>your
> > >>support for the Boomerang(R) Phrase Sampler. We will be releasing an
> > >>effects pedal at the summer NAMM show and following that with a new 
>looper
> > >>around Dec 06. The looper will have true stereo recording, vastly 
>improved
> > >>audio specs, long record time, 6 loops, multi level undo/redo, 
>multiple
> > >>loops can play synched or unsynched, and a slew of "utility" 
>features such
> > >>as an octave down effect for creating bass parts, auto fade out,
> > >>metronome, etc. It will be roughly half the size of the Rang(TM) 
>Plus! We
> > >>don't have a price yet, but it will be reasonable and maintain the 
>high
> > >>standard of quality the current Rang(TM) offers.
> > >
> > > And, after another exchange or two, this:
> > >
> > >>    We're burning the candle at both ends right now. The new 
>Rang(TM) III
> > >> will be in the $399 to $499 range I think.
> > >>    We do have more Blooperangs available, so feel free to let 
>others know
> > >> about them. We have some pro players that keep a backup Rang(TM) 
>like
> > >> they do an extra guitar...just in case.
> > >
> > > So, it looks like the new 'Rang will be pretty darn cool, with lots 
>of
> > > high-end features (perhaps even a few more surprises too; part of 
>one of
> > > the messages seemed to imply there were still more goodies about 
>which
> > > they couldn't yet say anything).  I'm sure Lynne & Mike will do 
>their best
> > > to maintain its dead simple user interface too. And all for an 
>extremely
> > > reasonable cost, IMNSHO.
> > >
> > > As well, there do seem to be more Blooperangs in stock, if anybody 
>wants a
> > > great deal on existing product (I seem to recall somebody was curious
> > > about that a little while back).
> > >
> > > --m.
> > > --
> > > _______
> > > "The revolution may be someone somewhere else..."
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>