Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
//Howzabout the Jamman? DJRND2
or Cycloops? Used PCM-42? Boomerang? EDP's //
Jamman? Kee-rist. How long ago have new ones been available? I bought mine
back in the stone age. It was good for what it was but can it compare to
the
RC-50? Never used a DJRND2 nor Cycloops. Boomerangs have (to my ears) a
too
degraded sound quality and is not in the sme league. The new ones planned
sound good, though. Can you buy a new Repeater? I'd consider buying a used
one but I really would worry about how long it would function as I
wouldn't
know how it was treated in the past. I did have one when they came out as
well as an EDP. But, both need pedal configurations so they're not $500.
Fact of the matter is a lot of the loopers you mentioned were (and some
still are) at various times hard to get. And expensive. Still are. What
other $500 loopers are out there currently for purchase new? That EH 2880
dog or whatever it's called?
----- Original Message -----
From: "mech" <mech@m3ch.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: RC-50 FEEDBACK WORKS
> At 1:03 PM -0700 7/19/06, Paul Richards wrote:
>>//Actually, I'd liken it more to a car that doesn't have seats: It'll
>>drive and it'll get you where you need to go, but the ride may not be
>>comfortable. //
>>
>>That's plain silly. Maybe like a car that doesn't have fold-down back
>>seat.
>
> That's not silly, that's charitable. To be truthful, for my purposes
>it's
> more like a car with no seats, *and* a blown head-gasket: I'm not even
> sure if it's going to get me where I need to be (and it'll be a darn
> uncomfortable ride getting there, if at all).
>
> If you're just a coffeehouse guitarist looping a few rhythm chucks over
> which to lay a solo (and this is nothing against coffeehouse guitarists
>--
> there are some damn fine ones out there), then a looper with no feedback
> is gonna work just fine.
>
> However, if you're using looping for ambient soundscapes,
>Frippertronics,
> or anything with continually shifting textures, then the feedback
>control
> is absolutely essential. Otherwise, as Charles mentioned, you're going
>to
> end up with layer upon layer upon layer until you've got a huge rolling
> mess. The feedback is what allows the older layers to fade away as new
> material is added upon them.
>
> That's one reason why a lot of us chucked the RC-20's in favor of the
> DD-20 (of which I have two, BTW). Although, in true "robbing peter to
>pay
> paul fashion", you end up gaining feedback but losing the ability (for
>the
> most part) to set loop length on the fly. Agh!
>
> As I said in my previous message, to each his own. However, don't
> minimize the importance of feedback, or insinuate that just because a
>tool
> doesn't contain a particular function that it's not a needed function
>("If
> we ain't got it, you don't need it").
>
>>Sounds like some folks have a hard-on for Boss/Roland.
>
> Not really. IMNSHO, Boss/Roland, like many big manufacturers will
> occasionally put out products which are utterly brilliant, and
> occasionally products that are utter shite. On the more irritating
>side,
> they also have a tendency to monkey with things incessantly. Sometimes
> this results in something cool; or sometimes this whacks out an
>otherwise
> excellent product (in my case, I'm thinking VG-8 to VG-88, or PS-3 to
> PS-5, for instance). Sometimes they *just* miss the mark -- as I feel
> they did with the RC-50 -- which is what makes it all the more
>infuriating
> sometimes. Sometimes they can be fixed, either by of future update or a
> third party. The Blues Driver, for instance, is a great design, but is
> hampered by Boss' cost-cutting use of cheap crappy components. Listen
>to
> the Keeley-modded BD-2 though, which replaces the stock junk in the box
> with higher quality components, and it just sings.
>
> After a while, you learn that newer is not necessarily better with Boss,
> so you merely assess what's in front of you. Occasionally what they've
> done is cool. Occasionally what they've done is completely messed up.
>
> You've got to look at what's actually there, not the stupid name on the
> box.
>
>>The RC-50 is an amazing product for $500 USD. A few years ago and you'd
>be
>>lucky to touch anything with that much capability for 5 big ones.
>
> As pointed out earlier, the Repeater was out a few years ago and I got
> mine new for less than 5 big ones. Howzabout the Jamman? DJRND2 or
> Cycloops? Used PCM-42? Boomerang? EDP's been around forever, and you
> could get one for not that much more (eh, don't talk to me 'bout stereo
> though). All have their plusses and minuses, but five bills is a good
> median number and stuff has been coming out around that price/feature
> point for quite some time.
>
> What I'll give you is that the RC-50 is a major step forward just
>because
> it's produced by a major well-known name in pedals, and that by its very
> nature is going to give looping a big boost. However, to finally have
> that and have the product come sooooooo close, but then in the end to
> *just* miss the mark -- that's what is so frustrating. I guess maybe we
> just wait for the RC-70 then...?
>
> --m
> --
> _______
> "I want to keep you alive so there is always the possibility of
>murder...
> later"
>