[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Date Index][
Thread Index][
Author Index]
Coffeehouse Guitar (was: RC-50 FEEDBACK WORKS)
Title: Coffeehouse Guitar (was: RC-50 FEEDBACK
WORKS)
At 12:32 AM -0400 7/20/06, Jfloridis@aol.com wrote:
"If you're just a coffeehouse
guitarist looping a few rhythm chucks
over which to lay a solo (and this is nothing against coffeehouse
guitarists -- there are some damn fine ones out there), then a
looper
with no feedback is gonna work just fine."
perhaps it's the just in "just a coffeehouse guitarist..."
that stings a little..... : )
Agh! I hate that little word!!! I use it far too much
-- I usually make it a point to go through and delete as many
instances as possible when editing a post -- yet it still comes back
to bite me no matter how many times I re-read before hitting
send.
Needless to say, that isn't what I meant at all. How
about...
Change:
"If you're just a coffeehouse guitarist looping a few rhythm
chucks...",
to
this: "If you're a coffeehouse guitarist just looping a few
rhythm chucks...".
Kinda changes the emphasis there. The latter is actually
much closer to what I meant. Especially since I was really
trying to go out of my way *not* to trivialize coffeehouse guitarists,
then there I go and put my foot into a different beartrap.
D'oh.
1000 pardons, Effendi!
as far as feedback with the rc50,
the detailed descriptions in buzap's postings specifically, i'll have
to spend some time with that, but i know i don't want to be messing
with mixers.....that kind of screws the whole point of having
everything in one unit.
Yeah, I'd generally agree that once a mixer comes into the
picture, I find it's easier to toss the dedicated foot pedals.
Then fall back to a portable setup with everything pre-wired into a
small rack plus a controller.
And, as Daryll pointed out, Buzap obviously put a lot of time and
effort into that write-up, and does deserve a great deal of thanks for
going through and documenting the workaround.
--m.
--
_______
"Snakes on a Plane..."
