Support |
--- Krispen Hartung <khartung@cableone.net> wrote: > Shall we develop the 12 steps to transitioning from > a hardware to notebook > guitar system? :) First step: realizing that you > are addicted to hardware. I was thinking (am still) about this a lot as I have been looking at software that can replace some of my hardware synths. I've always really dug synthesis and this has really invigorated my love for all things synth or processing. Why? Because it's no longer tied to hardware. Here's my case. A few of us (and me) have been bashing Roland/Boss because of what we percieve as shortcomings on the RC-50. Why? Well because we feel that above all Roland is a company. A big company with investors and a lot at stake to make them happy with dividend checks. When they make something they think cash/feature. If it's not something that will help sell more units, more often than not it's tossed to the curb. Some suit says, "Let a boutique company like Looperlative Audio Research take care of that need." At the end of the day, they're right. But, along comes software processing/instruments. Here an inventor/programmer can make anything the fuck they want because other than the time and effort it will take them to code it there is no other expense incurred. Features can be added and not a single sweatshop worker will have to solder a damn thing to make it happen. Marketing? Give betas away free and talk to as many lists as you can about why your product rocks and how interested you are in suggestions and be honest about what features you'll be adding in future revisions. In the end what you find is a healthy crop of really interesting and unique virtual devices that would probably never be economically viable as hardware but seem to be doing fine as software. This is really, really exciting. It's a great time for music, that's for sure. Mark __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com