Re: RC-50 wierdness

[Teddy <teddybutter@mac.com>]

yes, but... along with the SAME loops that were recorded live through  
an amp.

I'm a pro tools guru, if it were only recording the loops into PT and  
synching it with tempo I would have been done in 3.4 seconds like you  
said.

what I've done is recorded a song live with the rc-50 running through  
an amp.
it's a performance that I don't want to change, just help it out a  
little.
so, to help out the sound of it I want to re-record the RC-50 loops  
back into pt.
then I have to sync those with the (same) loops that were recorded  
already.

do you see what I'm doing now? am I explaining it enough?

I think the only REAL way is to record the loops back into my live  
session after the fact for the whole song duration and ignore PT's  
tempo.
kind of sucks though cause then if I want to loop other stuff in PT I  
have no tempo sync

thanks for your help

teddy

On Feb 12, 2007, at 10:02 AM, monk wrote:

> i read the other email and it doesn't explain why it won't work.  
> unless i'm misunderstanding. you want to take the loops you've made  
> on the rc-50 and use them in a protools session? please clarify.
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Teddy wrote:
>
>> that won't work with what I'm doing.
>> see my next email which explains my process a bit more in detail.
>>
>> thanks anyway.
>>
>> Teddy
>>
>> On Feb 12, 2007, at 9:50 AM, monk wrote:
>>
>>> all you have to do is use the grid mode and resize the loop to  
>>> whatever the new tempo is. it takes about 3.4 seconds.